It can be efficient on widespread multicore systems. A possible solution is to use more threads. System may not has enough capacity to send messages with necessary rate in a single-threaded mode. For such situation the Ethernet network packet size has to correspond to standard 1500 bytes MTU, which is widely used in the Internet. Especially if UDP protocol is used and it is necessary to avoid packet fragmentation, for example for high-speed reliable transport protocols based on UDP. But generating traffic with Gbps data-rates also brings some complications. As a communication technology evolves the higher speeds are used more and more in various applications. In this paper a utilization of the high data-rates channels by threading of sending and receiving is studied. The most stable results were achieved using FC Direct. The comparison has revealed that of all investigated solutions TIXstream achieves maximum link utilization in presence of lightweight impairments. This research focuses on a comparison of approaches using intuitive parameters such as data rate and duration of transmission. The goal of this work is to test solutions under equal network conditions and thus compare transmission performance of recent proprietary alternatives for FTP/TCP within 10 Gigabit/s networks where there are high latencies and packet loss in WANs. To assess the capabilities of current applications for fast data transport, the following commercial solutions were investigated: Velocity-a data transport application of BitSpeed LLC TIXstream-a data transport application of Tixel GmbH FileCatalyst Direct-a data transport application of Unlimi-Tech Software Inc Catapult Server-a data transport application of XDT PTY LTD ExpeDat-a commercial data transport solution of Data Expedition, Inc. Common solutions, such as File Transport Protocol (FTP) based on TCP/IP stack, are being increasingly replaced by modern protocols based on more efficient stacks. This work compares commercial fast data transport approaches through 10 Gbit/s Wide Area Network (WAN).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |